Peer Review Process

The editorial board will select each article for consideration through a preliminary review procedure. Articles received will be sent to reviewers to be selected through a double anonymous peer review procedure. Reviewers are given two months to review the substantial and technical components of each manuscript. IJCIT Journal collaborates with reviewers who are experts in their fields.

The double anonymous peer review technique is used to send manuscripts to reviewers that are considered interesting to readers. The editor decides based on the reviewer's recommendation, with three options: reject, revise, or accept. The editorial board will screen all manuscripts. The editor has the authority to choose which articles will be published next.

If the manuscript does not meet the journal's standards, the manuscript will be rejected without further review by the editor.

Review Process:
Authors submit manuscripts.
Initial review by the Editor (some manuscripts are rejected or returned before being reviewed). Based on the provisions of the IJCIT Journal, the Editor will appoint reviewers for manuscripts that have completed the template. Manuscripts that do not match the focus and scope of the IJCIT Journal will be rejected, as well as manuscripts that do not follow the IJCIT Journal template, the manuscript will be returned to the author.
The review process is carried out by means of double anonymous peer review with two (2) reviewers; if the assessment results are not balanced, it will be submitted to additional reviewers. The maximum review limit is two months. The editor will then provide decision information to the author.