The Editorial Board will select each article for consideration through the Preliminary Review procedure. This will be sent to the Peer Reviewer for selection through the Double anonymous peer review procedure. Peer reviewers take two months to review the substantial and technical components of each manuscript. The manuscript will be sent back to the author for revision. Jurnal Paradigma collaborates with peer reviewers who are experts in their fields.

At least three articles, both nationally recognized scientific journal publications and international scientific journal publications, have been written by inviting the reviewer as the first author or member of the author.

The Double anonymous peer review technique is used to send manuscripts to reviewers who are considered to be of interest to our readers. The editor decides based on the reviewer's recommendation, with three choices: rejected, revised, or accepted. The editorial board will select all manuscripts. If the manuscript does not meet the journal's standards, it will be rejected without further review by the editor.

The editor has the authority to choose which papers to publish later.

Review Process:

1. The author sends the manuscript.
2. An initial review by the Editor (some manuscripts may be rejected or returned before review). Based on the regulations in the Paradigma Journal, the Editor will assign reviewers for manuscripts that have completed the template. Manuscripts that are not in accordance with the focus and scope of the Paradigma Journal will be rejected. If you do not follow the Paradigma Journal template, the manuscript will be returned to the author.
3. The review process is carried out by means of a Double anonymous peer review. There are two (2) reviewers; if the results of the assessment are unbalanced, it will be submitted to an additional reviewer. The maximum limit is two months for review.
4. Editor's decision
5. Confirmation to the author