Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Produk Otomasi Paling Diminati Dengan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31294/paradigma.v24i1.971Keywords:
Decision Support System, Multi Factor Evaluation Process, Automation ProductsAbstract
Products are goods or services that are traded to fulfill needs. Many products sold at PT Autonics Indonesia make it difficult for the company to determine which products are most interested. The current product supply system still uses a manual system with Microsoft Excel and there is no decision support system for determining the most interested product with the proper method so that the decisions taken are less accurate, effective and efficient. The method proposed in this research is Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method with the purpose to apply a decision support system to assist the company in determining the most interested products, make the decision easier, more accurate, effective. In this research, 5 (five) factors were used to determine the most interested products, that is: price, type, quality, inventory and warranty. The results acquired in this research are ranking of the most interested automation products sorted from the highest to lowest from Total Evaluation Weight (TEW) value. Based on the calculations performed by Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method, 5 (five) alternatives were obtained with the highest Total Evaluation Weight (TEW) value, including: Fiber Optic Sensors with a value of 4.90, Control Switch with a value of 4.75, Digital Panel Meters with a value of 4.60, Temperature Controllers with a value of 4.35 and Timers with a value of 4.30 which will be a solution to simplify the determination of the most interested products at PT Autonics Indonesia.
References
Afrisawati, A., & Irianto, I. (2019). Pemilihan Bibit Ternak Sapi Potong Melalui Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Metode Mfep. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 6(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v6i1.392
Aningke, T., Pradana, Y., Facharaini, N. I., Gukguk, M. R., & Perdana, A. (2018). Merekomendasikan Mode Hijab Terbaik. Jurnal Informatika, 18(1), 1–8.
Asnal, H., Efendi, M., Arita Fitri, T., & Anam, M. K. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penunjukan Supplier Pengadaan Perangkat Kesehatan Pada Instalasi Farmasi RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru Dengan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process. SATIN - Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.33372/stn.v6i1.618
Budihartanti, C., Dewi, Y. N., & Purnamasari, I. (2021). Penerapan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process Dalam Rekomendasi Maskapai Penerbangan. Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v5i1.466
Diana. (2018). Metode Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. In Deepublish. Deepublish.
Firmansyah, M. A. (2019). Buku Pemasaran Produk dan Merek. In CV. Penerbit Qiara Media (Issue August). CV. PENERBIT QIARA MEDIA.
Gunawan, C. (2018). Mahir Menguasai SPSS. Deepublish.
Latif, L. A., Jamil, M., & H I Abbas, S. (2018). Buku Ajar: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasi. Deepublish.
Mustofa, A. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Menentukan Dosis Pemupukan Pada Tanaman Kelapa Sawit Dengan Menggunakan (POC)NASA. Jurnal Intra-Tech, 1(2), 47–54.
Nata, A., & Apridonal, Y. (2020). Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Mfep Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Penerima Bantuan Siswa Miskin. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 6(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v6i2.597
Poningsih, & Dkk. (2020). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN Penerapan & 10 contoh Studi Kasus (T. L. Janner Simarmata (ed.)). Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Prakoso, G., Kertahadi, & Susilo, H. (2017). PENGARUH PENERAPAN OTOMASI PERPUSTAKAAN TERHADAP KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN KINERJA DI PERPUSTAKAAN UMUM (Studi pada Kantor Perpustakaan dan Dokumentasi Pemerintah Kota Batu). Admnistrasi Bisnis, 50(6), 144–150.
Qomariah, S., & Rangan, A. Y. (2020). Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Mfep Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyeleksian Atlet Pencak Silat. Just TI (Jurnal Sains Terapan Teknologi Informasi), 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.46964/justti.v12i1.175
Saleh, A. R., Warouw, D. M. D., & Runtuwene, A. (2021). PERAN SISTEM OTOMASI DALAM MENINGKATKAN PELAYANAN PADA PENGGUNA PERPUSTAKAAN DAN KEARSIPAN KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN | Saleh | ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI. ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI, 3, 1–6.
Silalahi, A. P., & Simanullang, H. G. (2018). Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process ( Mfep ) Untuk Rekomendasi Jurusan Pada Sekolah. Methoda, 8(1), 84–91.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (C. Alfabeta (ed.)). CV. Alfabeta.
Suryapranatha, D. (2021). PERBANDINGAN DUA PRODUK DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEM. Jurnal Industry Xplore, 6(1), 48–56.
Widayati Putri, S., Arifia, A., & Muqtadir, A. (2021). SPK PEMILIHAN FILM KARTUN LAYAK TONTON UNTUK ANAK-ANAK MENGGUNAKAN METODE MFEP ( MULTI FACTOR EVALUATION PROCESS ). CURTINA: Computer Science or Informatic Journal, 2(1).
Yanti, Y., Safitri, D. A., & Alamsyah, R. A. (2020). Pemilihan Cemilan Khas Sampit Terlaris Pada Kedai 24 Dengan Metode AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 2(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2020.2.1.4676
Yanto, M. (2021). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP Dalam Seleksi Produk. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Informasi Bisnis, 3(1), 167–174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Laila Ersa, Ibnu Satria Fajar Al Afif, Syarif Hidayatulloh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published under the PARADIGMA Journal are made freely available online immediately upon publication, without subscription barriers to access. Authors who choose to participate in the PARADIGMA Journal initiative and pay to have their paper freely available online will be asked to sign an open-access license agreement.
Our PARADIGMA Journal implements are CC-BY-SA, This license permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use.
