Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Produk Otomasi Paling Diminati Dengan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process

Authors

  • Laila Ersa Universitas Nusa Mandiri
  • Ibnu Satria Fajar Al Afif Universitas Nusa Mandiri
  • Syarif Hidayatulloh Universitas Nusa Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31294/paradigma.v24i1.971

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Multi Factor Evaluation Process, Automation Products

Abstract

Products are goods or services that are traded to fulfill needs. Many products sold at PT Autonics Indonesia make it difficult for the company to determine which products are most interested. The current product supply system still uses a manual system with Microsoft Excel and there is no decision support system for determining the most interested product with the proper method so that the decisions taken are less accurate, effective and efficient. The method proposed in this research is Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method with the purpose to apply a decision support system to assist the company in determining the most interested products, make the decision easier, more accurate, effective. In this research, 5 (five) factors were used to determine the most interested products, that is: price, type, quality, inventory and warranty. The results acquired in this research are ranking of the most interested automation products sorted from the highest to lowest from Total Evaluation Weight (TEW) value. Based on the calculations performed by Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method, 5 (five) alternatives were obtained with the highest Total Evaluation Weight (TEW) value, including: Fiber Optic Sensors with a value of 4.90, Control Switch with a value of 4.75, Digital Panel Meters with a value of 4.60, Temperature Controllers with a value of 4.35 and Timers with a value of 4.30 which will be a solution to simplify the determination of the most interested products at PT Autonics Indonesia.

References

Afrisawati, A., & Irianto, I. (2019). Pemilihan Bibit Ternak Sapi Potong Melalui Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Metode Mfep. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 6(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v6i1.392

Aningke, T., Pradana, Y., Facharaini, N. I., Gukguk, M. R., & Perdana, A. (2018). Merekomendasikan Mode Hijab Terbaik. Jurnal Informatika, 18(1), 1–8.

Asnal, H., Efendi, M., Arita Fitri, T., & Anam, M. K. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penunjukan Supplier Pengadaan Perangkat Kesehatan Pada Instalasi Farmasi RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru Dengan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process. SATIN - Sains Dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.33372/stn.v6i1.618

Budihartanti, C., Dewi, Y. N., & Purnamasari, I. (2021). Penerapan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process Dalam Rekomendasi Maskapai Penerbangan. Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v5i1.466

Diana. (2018). Metode Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. In Deepublish. Deepublish.

Firmansyah, M. A. (2019). Buku Pemasaran Produk dan Merek. In CV. Penerbit Qiara Media (Issue August). CV. PENERBIT QIARA MEDIA.

Gunawan, C. (2018). Mahir Menguasai SPSS. Deepublish.

Latif, L. A., Jamil, M., & H I Abbas, S. (2018). Buku Ajar: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasi. Deepublish.

Mustofa, A. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Menentukan Dosis Pemupukan Pada Tanaman Kelapa Sawit Dengan Menggunakan (POC)NASA. Jurnal Intra-Tech, 1(2), 47–54.

Nata, A., & Apridonal, Y. (2020). Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Mfep Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Penerima Bantuan Siswa Miskin. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 6(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v6i2.597

Poningsih, & Dkk. (2020). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN Penerapan & 10 contoh Studi Kasus (T. L. Janner Simarmata (ed.)). Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Prakoso, G., Kertahadi, & Susilo, H. (2017). PENGARUH PENERAPAN OTOMASI PERPUSTAKAAN TERHADAP KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN KINERJA DI PERPUSTAKAAN UMUM (Studi pada Kantor Perpustakaan dan Dokumentasi Pemerintah Kota Batu). Admnistrasi Bisnis, 50(6), 144–150.

Qomariah, S., & Rangan, A. Y. (2020). Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Mfep Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyeleksian Atlet Pencak Silat. Just TI (Jurnal Sains Terapan Teknologi Informasi), 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.46964/justti.v12i1.175

Saleh, A. R., Warouw, D. M. D., & Runtuwene, A. (2021). PERAN SISTEM OTOMASI DALAM MENINGKATKAN PELAYANAN PADA PENGGUNA PERPUSTAKAAN DAN KEARSIPAN KOTA TIDORE KEPULAUAN | Saleh | ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI. ACTA DIURNA KOMUNIKASI, 3, 1–6.

Silalahi, A. P., & Simanullang, H. G. (2018). Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process ( Mfep ) Untuk Rekomendasi Jurusan Pada Sekolah. Methoda, 8(1), 84–91.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (C. Alfabeta (ed.)). CV. Alfabeta.

Suryapranatha, D. (2021). PERBANDINGAN DUA PRODUK DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEM. Jurnal Industry Xplore, 6(1), 48–56.

Widayati Putri, S., Arifia, A., & Muqtadir, A. (2021). SPK PEMILIHAN FILM KARTUN LAYAK TONTON UNTUK ANAK-ANAK MENGGUNAKAN METODE MFEP ( MULTI FACTOR EVALUATION PROCESS ). CURTINA: Computer Science or Informatic Journal, 2(1).

Yanti, Y., Safitri, D. A., & Alamsyah, R. A. (2020). Pemilihan Cemilan Khas Sampit Terlaris Pada Kedai 24 Dengan Metode AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 2(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2020.2.1.4676

Yanto, M. (2021). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP Dalam Seleksi Produk. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Informasi Bisnis, 3(1), 167–174.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-14

How to Cite

Ersa, L., Afif, I. S. F. A., & Hidayatulloh, S. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Produk Otomasi Paling Diminati Dengan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process. Paradigma - Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 24(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.31294/paradigma.v24i1.971