Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Each article submitted to the editorial will be selected through a Pre-Review process by the Editorial Board. Then, the article will be sent to the Peer Reviewer for further selection with the Double Blind Peer Review process. After that, the article will be returned to the author for revision. This process takes two months for maximum time. In each manuscript, Peer Reviewers will be assessed from a substantial and technical aspect. Peer Reviewers who collaborate with CONTEN : Computer and Network Technology are experts in their respective fields.


The principle of recruiting reviewers has at least written in a scientific journal as the first author, or co-author of three articles, both in accredited national scale scientific journal publications and international scale scientific journal publications.


All submitted manuscripts will be selected by the editorial board. Manuscripts evaluated by the editor that do not meet the journal's criteria will be rejected without external review. Manuscripts that are evaluated to interest our readers are sent to reviewers using the Double Blind Peer Review system. The editor then makes a decision based on the reviewer's recommendations with several possibilities, namely: rejected, revision needed, or accepted.


The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts should be published later.


Review Process:


The author submits the manuscript

Preliminary review by the Editor (some manuscripts may be rejected or returned before the review process). If it is not in accordance with the scope of CONTEN : Computer and Network Technology, it will be returned for rejection, so if there are things that are not in accordance with the regular CONTEN : Computer and Network Technology, then the paper will be returned to the author, if it is in accordance with CONTEN : Computer and Network Technology environmental style, then the editor will assign it to the reviewer.

The review process was carried out by means of a blind review. Total reviewers are two (2) people, if the results of the assessment are not balanced, it will be submitted to additional reviewers. The maximum limit is two months for review.

Editor's decision

Confirm with the author