Combination of Logarithmic Least Square Weighting and MAUT Method for Best Employee Selection in Retail Companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31294/mf9wad40

Keywords:

Data-Driven, LLSW, MAUT, Combination, Subjective

Abstract

Selecting the best employees plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of retail companies. Given that each employee has unique roles, responsibilities, and working conditions, creating a truly fair and consistent assessment standard can be challenging. Additionally, subjective factors such as personal bias or preferences of the assessor can influence the evaluation outcome. The integration of LLSW and the MAUT method in employee selection offers a systematic approach that combines precise weighting with multi-criteria utility analysis. This combination aims to improve the accuracy, objectivity, and transparency of the decision-making process. By utilizing both methods, retail companies can establish a more effective, transparent, and data-driven selection system, ensuring that the best employees are chosen based on rational and fair evaluations. The results of the employee selection process using LLSW and MAUT showed that Employee RS ranked first with the highest score of 0.7485, indicating the strongest qualifications compared to the other candidates. Employee LK and Employee ML ranked second and third with scores of 0.6035 and 0.572, respectively, demonstrating solid performance. These selection outcomes can assist companies in recruiting the most suitable workforce for their operational needs and vision, ultimately leading to improved productivity and service quality in the long run. The main contribution of this research is capable of improving accuracy and fairness in employee performance evaluation. This approach reduces the subjectivity that often occurs in conventional assessment processes in the retail sector, as well as providing a basis for transparent and measurable decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akpan, U., & Morimoto, R. (2022). An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, 101256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101256

AlFaraidy, F. A., Teegala, K. S., & Dwivedi, G. (2023). Selection of a Sustainable Structural Floor System for an Office Building Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. Sustainability, 15(17), 13087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713087

Arshad, M. W., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Combination of Rank Sum and Multi Attribute Utility Theory in Determining the Best Receptionist Performance. KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 4(5), 2549–2558. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i5.1791

Aydi, W., & Alatiyyah, M. (2024). Pareto parameter estimation by merging locally weighted median of multiple neural networks and weighted least squares. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 87, 524–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.12.063

Benadia Latifah, & Putri Aisyiyah Rakhma Devi. (2022). Seleksi Karyawan Outsourcing Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid. Jurnal INSTEK (Informatika Sains Dan Teknologi), 7(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.24252/instek.v7i2.31656

Chen, S. (2024). The Application of Big Data and Fuzzy Decision Support Systems in the Innovation of Personalized Music Teaching in Universities. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17(1), 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00623-4

Csató, L. (2024). How to choose a completion method for pairwise comparison matrices with missing entries: An axiomatic result. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 164, 109063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109063

Ezell, B., Lynch, C. J., & Hester, P. T. (2021). Methods for Weighting Decisions to Assist Modelers and Decision Analysts: A Review of Ratio Assignment and Approximate Techniques. In Applied Sciences (Vol. 11, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110397

Hadad, S. H., Chandra, I., Wang, J., Megawaty, D. A., Setiawansyah, S., & Yudhistira, A. (2025). Dynamic Weight Allocation In Modified Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis With Symmetry Point For Real-Time Decision Support. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 6(1 SE-Articles), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.1.4170

Karim, A. (2024). Implementation of the Multi-Objective Optimization Method on the Basic of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) and Entropy Weighting in New Employee Recruitment. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 5(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v5i2.4859

Lubis, J. H., Mesran, M., & Siregar, C. A. (2024). The Decision Support System for Cashier Recruitment Implements the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory Method. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 6(1), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v6i1.5352

Magableh, G. M. (2024). An integrated model for rice supplier selection strategies and a comparative analysis of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approaches based on the fuzzy entropy weight method for evaluating rice suppliers. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0301930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301930

Mahendra, F. J., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Honor Panitia Pengawas Menggunakan Kombinasi Logarithmic Least Squares Weighting dan MABAC. Journal of Computer System and Informatics (JoSYC), 5(3), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v5i3.5158

Megawaty, D. A., Damayanti, D., Sumanto, S., Permata, P., Setiawan, D., & Setiawansyah, S. (2025). Development of a Decision Support System Based on New Approach Respond to Criteria Weighting Method and Grey Relational Analysis: Case Study of Employee Recruitment Selection. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.9.1.2744

Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Cavallaro, F., Hezam, I. M., & Lakshmi, J. (2023). An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy Closeness Coefficient-Based OCRA Method for Sustainable Urban Transportation Options Selection. Axioms, 12(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12020144

Nuroji, N. (2022). Penerapan Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Penentuan Pegawai Terbaik. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Dan Ilmu Komputer (JIMA-ILKOM), 1(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.58602/jima-ilkom.v1i2.7

Pratama, R. A., & Hardianto, R. (2024). Permanent Employee Assessment Decision Support System using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method. Journal of Computer Scine and Information Technology, 10(2 SE-Articles), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.35134/jcsitech.v10i2.100

Purba, R. R., Mesran, M., Zaen, M. T. A., Setiawansyah, S., Siregar, D., & Ambarsari, E. W. (2023). Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method. The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), 7(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.30865/ijics.v7i1.6157

Putra, D. W. T., Oktavia, I. S., Swara, G. Y., & Yulianti, E. (2022). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Seleksi Pengangkatan Karyawan Tetap pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Sawahlunto. Jurnal Ilmiah ILKOMINFO - Ilmu Komputer & Informatika, 5(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.47324/ilkominfo.v5i2.147

Saputra, V. H., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Penerapan Metode SWARA dan Grey Relational Analysis Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology Information, 2(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v2i1.107

Sarsar, L., & Echaoui, A. (2024). The Effect Of Economic Growth On Of Renewable Energy Production In Morocco: An Empirical Analysis Source-Wise From 1964 to 2021. International Journal of Trade and Management, 1(3 SE-Articles), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.ijtm-vol1iss3.1363

Setiawansyah, S., & Rahmanto, Y. (2025). Implementation of the Geometric Mean Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (G-MAUT) in Determining the Best Honorary Employees. Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science, 3(2 SE-Articles), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.58602/jics.v3i2.50

Siciliani, L., Taccardi, V., Basile, P., Di Ciano, M., & Lops, P. (2023). AI-based decision support system for public procurement. Information Systems, 119, 102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2023.102284

Sulistiani, H., Setiawansyah, Palupiningsih, P., Hamidy, F., Sari, P. L., & Khairunnisa, Y. (2023). Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution. 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017

Wang, J., Darwis, D., Gunawan, R. D., & Ariany, F. (2025). Optimizing E-Commerce Platform Selection Using Root Assessment Method and MEREC Weighting. Jurnal Informatika Dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, 6(1 SE-Articles), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33365/jatika.v6i1.6

Wang, J., Darwis, D., Setiawansyah, S., & Rahmanto, Y. (2024). Implementation of MABAC Method and Entropy Weighting in Determining the Best E-Commerce Platform for Online Business. JiTEKH, 12(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.35447/jitekh.v12i2.1000

Wang, J., Setiawansyah, S., & Rahmanto, Y. (2024). Decision Support System for Choosing the Best Shipping Service for E-Commerce Using the

SAW and CRITIC Methods. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Dan Ilmu Komputer (JIMA-ILKOM), 3(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i2.32

Yudhistira, A., Wang, J., Rahmanto, Y., & Setiawansyah, S. (2024). Decision Support System for Optimizing Supplier Selection Using TOPSIS and Entropy Weighting Methods. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 4(5 SE-), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.456

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Combination of Logarithmic Least Square Weighting and MAUT Method for Best Employee Selection in Retail Companies. (2025). Paradigma - Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 27(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.31294/mf9wad40

Most read articles by the same author(s)