Struktur Kepemilikan Dan Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Barang Konsumsi Di Indonesia

Authors

  • Rudy Syafariansyah Dachlan Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda
  • Sri Wahyuti Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda
  • Nur Fadilah Aini Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31294/jab.v5i2.9902

Keywords:

Kinerja Keuangan, Profitabilitas, Struktur Kepemilikan, Struktur Modal, Sektor Barang Konsumsi

Abstract

Struktur kepemilikan merupakan faktor penting dalam menentukan kinerja keuangan perusahaan, terutama di industri barang konsumsi cepat saji Indonesia yang kompetitif antara perusahaan keluarga dan perusahaan multinasional. Penelitian ini meneliti pengaruh kepemilikan terhadap profitabilitas, struktur modal, dan nilai perusahaan dengan membandingkan PT Mayora Indah Tbk dan PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk selama periode 2020–2024. Desain penelitian yang digunakan bersifat komparatif kuantitatif dengan data sekunder dari Bursa Efek Indonesia, berupa laporan keuangan yang telah diaudit dan laporan tahunan perusahaan. Analisis dilakukan terhadap ROE, DER, dan PBV menggunakan uji normalitas serta uji t independen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Unilever memiliki profitabilitas dan valuasi pasar yang lebih tinggi, sedangkan Mayora memiliki tingkat leverage yang lebih rendah dan stabil. Temuan ini memperluas teori trade-off dengan menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan keluarga cenderung menerapkan under-leverage untuk menjaga stabilitas, sementara perusahaan multinasional lebih agresif dalam pembiayaan utang demi mendorong pertumbuhan. Pendekatan longitudinal mengungkap bahwa pola ini tetap konsisten setelah pandemi, memberikan implikasi penting bagi investor, manajer, dan pembuat kebijakan. Penelitian ini juga merekomendasikan penguatan peran investor institusional sebagai mekanisme pengawasan manajerial. Penelitian ini memiliki keterbatasan karena periode observasi yang relatif singkat dan cakupan industri yang sempit. Penelitian selanjutnya disarankan untuk memperluas data dan sektor yang diteliti agar hasilnya lebih representatif.

References

Al Azizah, U. S., & Haron, R. (2025). The sustainability imperative: evaluating the effect of ESG on corporate financial performance before and after the pandemic. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01401-8

Amalia, M., & Supriyanto, E. (2024). The Influence of Profitability and Leverage on Company Value with Corporate Social Responsibility as a Mediating Variable. In B. Awwad (Ed.), The AI Revolution: Driving Business Innovation and Research: Volume 2 (pp. 1003–1015). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54383-8_76

Auer, B. R. (2022). On false discoveries of standard t-tests in investment management applications. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00453-0

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2020). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach 8th ed (8th ed.). Jhon Wiley & Son - 2020.

Chirico, F., Eddleston, K. A., & Patel, P. C. (2025). Does it Pay to Patent Green Innovations? Stock Market Reactions to Family and Nonfamily Firms’ Green Patents. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(4), 947–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05942-w

Dong, N., Wang, F., Zhang, J., & Zhou, J. (2020). Ownership structure and real earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106733

Ebner, B., & Henze, N. (2023). On the eigenvalues associated with the limit null distribution of the Epps-Pulley test of normality. Statistical Papers, 64(3), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-022-01336-6

Evianti, D., Hasanudin, A. I., Mulyasari, W., & Soleha, N. (2025). Exploring the impact of profitability, debt covenant, and financial flexibility on firm value: Does company growth moderate the relationship? Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(5), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6805

Fariñas, J. C., Martín-Marcos, A., & Moreno, L. (2025). Scope, scale, and locational preferences: an analysis of emerging multinationals. Empirica, 52(3), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-025-09643-5

Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2024a). Related party transactions and earnings management in family firms: the moderating role of board characteristics. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(1), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-07-2022-0090

Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2024b). The effect of board diversity and tenure on environmental performance. Evidence from family and non-family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 14(3), 534–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-06-2023-0088

Ghinoi, S., De Vita, R., Steiner, B., & Sinatra, A. (2024). Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics, 62(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00755-5

Irmayanti, I., Supriadi, Y. N., Nurwati, E., Purwanto, S., & Moeljadi, M. (2025). The Effect of Capital Structure, Business Risk, and Asset Structure on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Automotive Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019–2023 Period. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 6(4), 2748–2759. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i4.4202

Iurkov, V., Koval, M., & Zaefarian, G. (2023). How Much Does Domestic Location Matter for B2B Firms’ Export Intensity? A Variance Decomposition Study. Journal of International Marketing, 31(4), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X231170206

Jarchow, S., Kaserer, C., & Keppler, H. (2023). Family firm performance in times of crisis—new evidence from Germany. In Eurasian Business Review (Vol. 13, Issue 3). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-023-00248-1

Kim, Y., Jung, S., & Kim, C. (2023). The Impact of Capital Structure on the Profitability Performance of ICT Firms. Processes, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020635

Koji, K., Adhikary, B. K., & Tram, L. (2020). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis between Listed Family and Non-Family Firms in Japan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13090215

Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A STATE‐PREFERENCE MODEL OF OPTIMAL FINANCIAL LEVERAGE. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x

Ljungkvist, T., Boers, B., & Andersén, J. (2023). Family firm versus non-family firm: the role of resource orchestration in fast-growing high-tech SMEs. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(3), 737–761. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2021-0137

Mamica, Ł., Mazur-Bubak, M., & Wróbel-Rotter, R. (2022). Can Biogas Plants Become a Significant Part of the New Polish Energy Deal? Business Opportunities for Poland’s Biogas Industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031614

Mashele, A., Mouton, M., & Pelcher, L. (2024). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: Family Firms vs. Non-Family Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17100444

Mbanyele, W. (2020). Ownership concentration, firm life cycle, and leverage: Evidence from Italian family firms. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838687

Mundt, P., Alfarano, S., & Milaković, M. (2022). Survival and the Ergodicity of Corporate Profitability. Management Science, 68(5), 3726–3734. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4395

Myers, S. C. (2001). Capital Structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.81

Pacheco, L. (2022). Ownership Concentration, Control, and Capital Structure in Family and Non-Family Firms. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(3), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.36283

Purwani, T., Listijo, H., Abdullah, N., & Sudiyatno, B. (2024). Sustainable growth, financial flexibility and working capital management in family firms: An empirical study in Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(4).2024.21

Seeck, H., & Kantola, A. (2023). The role of professional elites in shaping management practice: How the old mentalities condition the adoption of new management ideas. Management Learning, 54(5), 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076221111008

Swoboda, B., & Sinning, C. (2021). Endorsement of Global Product Brands by Global Corporate Brands – A Consumer Perspective Across Nations. In Management International Review (Vol. 61, Issue 4). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-021-00450-1

Symeonidou, N., DeTienne, D. R., & Chirico, F. (2022). The persistence of family firms: How does performance threshold affect family firm exit? Small Business Economics, 59(2), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00482-9

Tang, H., Xiong, L., & Peng, R. (2024). The mediating role of investor confidence on ESG performance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Finance Research Letters, 61(January), 104988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104988

Thien, N. H., Asif, J., Kweh, Q. L., & Ting, I. W. K. (2024). Firm efficiency and corporate performance: the moderating role of controlling shareholders. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(8), 2602–2623. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0253

Tsolas, I. E. (2021). Efficiency and Determinants of Capital Structure in the Greek Pharmaceutical, Cosmetic and Detergent Industries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120579

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications : design and methods. In SAGE Publications, Inc. (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zahid, R. M. A., Taran, A., Khan, M. K., & Simga-Mugan, C. (2023). The effect of ownership composition on corporate financial performance in the European frontier markets. Baltic Journal of Management, 18(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2021-0457

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02